Courtesy: Prof Young Lae Moon MD, Seoul, South Korea
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
Anatomy, Evaluation, Imaging & Management
Basic Anatomy & Biomechanics
-
The glenoid fossa is a shallow, dish-like structure
-
At any given time, only ~25% of the humeral head articulates with the glenoid
-
The glenoid labrum:
-
Deepens the socket
-
Increases humeral head contact area by ~70%
-
-
Shoulder stability depends on a balance between:
-
Static stabilizers (capsule, ligaments, labrum)
-
Dynamic stabilizers (muscles)
-
Static Stabilizers of the Shoulder
Superior Glenohumeral Ligament (SGHL)
-
Origin: Glenoid rim near labral apex
-
Inserts with the long head of biceps onto the anatomic neck of humerus
-
Function: Prevents inferior subluxation of the humeral head
Middle Glenohumeral Ligament (MGHL)
-
Origin: Anterior glenoid margin
-
Insertion: Anatomic neck of humerus
-
Function:
-
Primary stabilizer at ~45° of abduction
-
Works with anterosuperior fibers of the IGHL
-
Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament Complex (IGHL)
-
Components:
-
Anterior band
-
Posterior band
-
Axillary pouch
-
-
Origin: Anterior, inferior, and posterior glenoid
-
Insertion: Anatomic and surgical neck of humerus
-
Key role:
-
Primary static anterior stabilizer of the shoulder, especially in abduction and external rotation
-
Dynamic Stabilizers
Extrinsic Muscle
-
Deltoid
-
Main extrinsic stabilizer
-
Tends to translate the humeral head superiorly
-
Intrinsic Muscles
-
Provide compressive stabilization
-
Subscapularis
-
Principal anterior dynamic stabilizer
-
Most effective in lower ranges of abduction and external rotation
-
Clinical Evaluation
History
-
Timing and mechanism of injury
-
Sport or activity level
-
Number of instability episodes
-
Voluntary vs involuntary instability
-
Previous treatment (operative or non-operative)
Physical Examination Tests
Anterior Instability Drawer Test
-
Patient standing or supine
-
One hand stabilizes the glenoid
-
Other hand translates humeral head anteriorly and posteriorly
-
Assesses degree of translation and overriding
Crank (Apprehension) Test
-
Patient supine
-
Shoulder placed in abduction and external rotation
-
Positive test:
-
Patient shows apprehension
-
Points to anterior shoulder pain
-
-
If positive ? proceed to relocation test
Jobe’s Relocation Test
-
Examiner applies posterior force over humeral head
-
Relief of apprehension indicates anterior instability
-
Sudden release reproduces pain/apprehension
Sulcus Sign
-
Inferior traction applied to arm
-
Observe sulcus under lateral acromion
-
Grading:
-
<1 cm: normal / 1+
-
1–2 cm: 2+
-
2 cm: 3+
-
Ligamentous Laxity Assessment
Beighton Score (0–9)
-
Palms to floor with knees straight
-
Thumb hyperflexion
-
MCP hyperextension
-
Elbow recurvatum
-
Knee recurvatum
Score >/=4 suggests generalized ligamentous laxity
Classification of Shoulder Instability
By Degree
-
Subluxation
-
Dislocation
By Chronology
-
Acute
-
Recurrent
-
Chronic (fixed)
-
Locked
By Etiology
-
Traumatic
-
Repetitive microtrauma
-
Voluntary / involuntary
-
Congenital
-
Neuromuscular
-
Seizure-related
By Direction
-
Anterior
-
Posterior
-
Inferior
-
Multidirectional
Imaging Evaluation
Plain Radiographs
-
AP view
-
Acute dislocation
-
Glenoid rim fractures (bony Bankart)
-
-
Scapular Y view
-
Confirms reduction
-
-
Axillary view
-
Confirms reduction
-
Detects:
-
Anterior glenoid deficiency
-
Hill-Sachs lesion
-
-
CT Scan
-
Gold standard for bipolar bone loss
-
Quantifies:
-
Glenoid bone loss (GBL)
-
Size and orientation of Hill-Sachs lesion
-
-
Critical for surgical planning
MRI
-
Evaluates soft-tissue injuries:
-
Labral tears
-
Rotator cuff tears
-
Biceps pathology
-
HAGL / reverse HAGL
-
ALPSA lesions
-
GLAD lesions
-
Glenoid Bone Loss (GBL)
-
Commonly measured using the best-fit circle method
-
Critical thresholds:
-
>13.5% – increased failure of soft-tissue repair
-
>20% – osseous augmentation usually required
-
Glenoid Track Concept
-
Glenoid track around 83% of glenoid width
-
Represents area of humeral head contact with glenoid
On-Track vs Off-Track
-
On-track Hill-Sachs
-
Defect smaller than glenoid track
-
Lower risk of engagement
-
-
Off-track Hill-Sachs
-
Defect larger than glenoid track
-
High risk of engagement and instability
-
Calculations
-
Glenoid track = (0.83 × D) – d
-
Hill-Sachs interval = Hill-Sachs defect + bone bridge
-
Distance to Dislocation (DTD) = Glenoid track – Hill-Sachs interval
-
DTD = 0 -> On-track lesion
Management
Non-Operative Treatment
-
Suitable for:
-
Older patients
-
Low-demand individuals
-
Non-contact sports
-
First-time dislocation
-
No critical bone loss or cuff tear
-
-
Shared decision-making in young low-risk patients
Surgical Management
Indications
-
Age <20 years
-
Contact or collision sports
-
Male sex
-
Recurrent instability
-
Osseous Bankart lesion
-
Bipolar bone loss
-
Failed non-operative treatment
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
Key Recommendations
-
Use 4 anchors, appropriately spaced
-
Restore labral concavity
-
Optimize anchor trajectory
Technical Pearls
-
Anterosuperior viewing portal
-
Avoid anchor placement above 3 o’clock
-
Capsular plication with labral repair
-
Posteroinferior capsular stitches for balance
Remplissage Procedure
-
Fills Hill-Sachs defect with infraspinatus tendon and capsule
-
Converts lesion to extra-articular
-
Prevents engagement
Indications
-
Off-track Hill-Sachs with GBL <25%
-
Contact athletes or hyperlaxity
-
Near-track lesions
-
Failed Bankart repair without critical bone loss
Recurrence rates reported as low as ~5%
Coracoid Transfer Procedures
Bristow / Latarjet
-
Restores glenoid bone stock
-
Provides:
-
Bony augmentation
-
Dynamic sling effect from conjoined tendon
-
Capsular reinforcement
-
-
Effective for:
-
Critical bone loss
-
High-risk recurrent instability
-
Postoperative Rehabilitation
Phase 1: Immobilization
-
Sling protection
Phase 2: Passive & Active-Assisted Motion
-
Gradual ROM restoration
Phase 3: Strengthening
-
Rotator cuff
-
Scapular stabilizers
-
Sport-specific training
Return to sport/work: 4–6 months, depending on goals
Criteria-based testing recommended before return
Key Take-Home Messages
-
Shoulder stability is multifactorial
-
Bone loss assessment is critical
-
Glenoid track guides treatment
-
Young, active patients have high recurrence risk
-
Procedure selection must be individualized





Leave a Reply