• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
OrthopaedicPrinciples.com

OrthopaedicPrinciples.com

Integrating Principles and Evidence

Integrating Principles and Evidence

  • Home
  • Editorial Board
  • Our Books
    • Evidence Based Orthopaedic Principles
  • Courses
  • Exams
  • Reviews
  • Live Program
  • Contact

Non-Union? Let’s Solve It!

Courtesy: AO Trauma North America

Moderator:
Raymond D. Wright, Jr., MD
Professor
Orthopaedic Trauma Fellowship Director
Associate Residency Program Director
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky

Faculty:
Mitchell Bernstein, MD, FRCSC, FAAOS
Assistant Professor
Orthopedic Trauma & Limb Deformity
McGill University Health Center
Co-Director, Limb Deformity Unit, Shriners Hospital for Children
Montreal, Quebec

Paul E. Matuszewski, MD
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky

 

AO Trauma NA Master Review: Principles, Classification, and Management of Non-Unions

Faculty, Panel, and Operational Framework

  • Webinar: AO Trauma North America Webinar.
  • Topic: Non-Union: Let’s Solve It.
  • Moderator: Dr. Raymond Wright (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY).
  • Faculty Panelists:
    • Dr. Paul Matuszewski (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY).
    • Dr. Mitchell Bernstein (McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC).
  • Core Philosophy: Non-union surgery is systematic. Success relies on identifying the initial failure etiology and restoring biology and mechanical stability.

Core Classification and Diagnostic Principles

Morphological Classification of Sterile Non-Unions

Non-Union Subtype Radiographic Appearance Biological Status Primary Treatment Requirement
Hypertrophic Abundant callus (“elephant foot” or “horse hoof”) Fully viable and vascularized Mechanical stability (rigid fixation/compression)
Oligotrophic Minimal callus; rounded bone ends Viable but biologically under-stimulated Augmented stability $\pm$ biological stimulation
Atrophic Absent callus; tapered or osteopenic bone ends Biologically inert and poorly vascularized Biological stimulation (bone graft) + rigid stability

Defining Non-Union vs. Delayed Union

  • Clinical Threshold: Lack of progressive osseous bridging across serial radiographs over several months.
  • Tibia Benchmarks: Absence of bridging callus across at least two cortices by 4 months indicates a high risk of failure.
  • Predictive Value: Early bridging within the first 3 months strongly correlates with progression to union.

Systematic Three-Step Clinical Workup

  • Step 1: Identify Etiology: Determine why the fracture failed to heal.
    • Extrinsic host factors: Nicotine use, diabetes, endocrinopathies, nutritional deficiencies, NSAID or narcotic abuse.
    • Intrinsic factors: High-energy trauma, infection, extensive comminution, periosteal stripping, bone loss.
    • Surgeon factors: Hardware mismatch, malalignment, inadequate stability, distraction across fracture gaps.
  • Step 2: Address Causes Systematically:
    • Eradicate infection.
    • Correct axis and length discrepancies.
    • Provide rigid mechanical fixation and compression.
    • Deliver biological substrate (autograft, canal reamings, BMP).
  • Step 3: Individualize the Treatment Strategy: Tailor the plan to patient compliance, soft-tissue tolerance, systemic reserve, and functional demands.

Case 1: Atrophic Tibial Shaft Non-Union Following Polytrauma

Clinical Presentation

  • Demographics: 27-year-old male police officer (state trooper); non-smoker.
  • Mechanism: High-energy motor vehicle collision resulting in polytrauma.
  • Injury Anatomy: Gustilo-Anderson Type 3A open tibial shaft fracture with a 12–14 cm soft-tissue wound, butterfly segment, and ipsilateral tibial plateau fracture.
  • Status at 10 Months: All other fractures healed; persistent midshaft tibial non-union with pain during weight-bearing.
  • Exam: Antalgic gait, mid-tibial edema beneath an AFO (worn for traumatic peroneal nerve drop foot), neutral coronal/sagittal alignment, no drainage.
  • Laboratories: ESR, CRP, WBC, and endocrine markers normal.

Decision-Making: Why Exchange Nailing Was Selected

  • Reaming Biology: Reaming stimulates endosteal blood flow and clears intramedullary scar tissue.
  • Local Autograft: Reaming flutes deposit osteogenic cancellous bone paste directly around the non-union.
  • Stability Restoration: Upsizing the nail by at least 2.0 mm achieves rigid isthmic cortical contact, eliminating the loose “hot dog in a hallway” problem.
  • Contraindicated Action: Avoid “taking down” the non-union site. Disrupting fibrous tissue destroys local progenitor cells and extraosseous blood supply.
Exchange Nailing Parameter Clinical Guideline
Nail Upsizing Increase diameter by 2mm to restore stability
Canal Reaming Generates internal bone graft and stimulates endosteal blood flow
Surgical Approach Infrapatellar approach for routine extraction and hardware swap
Fracture Site Management Leave the non-union undisturbed; do not debride viable tissue
Expected Healing Timeline Slow process; approximately 60% healed by 6 months

Patient Outcome

  • Treated with reamed exchange nailing (increasing nail diameter by 2 mm).
  • Medial cortical bridging and resolving fracture lines appeared by 6 weeks.
  • Complete circumferential bridging across $>3$ cortices confirmed at 3 months.
  • Returned to full-duty active police work pain-free at 6 weeks.

Case 2: Diaphyseal Tibial Non-Union with Critical Bone Defect

Clinical Presentation

  • Demographics: 34-year-old male motorcyclist struck by a car.
  • Injury Anatomy: Gustilo-Anderson Type 3B open tibia fracture managed with debridement, intramedullary nailing, and local rotational flap coverage.
  • Status at 12 Months: Persistent localized pain, retained intramedullary nail, well-healed soft-tissue flap.
  • Imaging: CT scan demonstrated a 20 mm diaphyseal cortical defect without bony contact.
  • Laboratories: Slightly elevated inflammatory markers; vitamin D insufficiency.

The Radiographic Apparent Bone Gap (RABG)

  • Definition (Will Lack et al.): Average bone gap measured across medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior cortices on orthogonal radiographs.
  • Prognostic Threshold:
    •  < 25 mm: Favorable likelihood of union without extensive segmental intervention.
    • Age 25: High failure rate; requires planned bone reconstruction (Masquelet technique or bone transport).

Frame Reconstruction Strategy (Dr. Mitchell Bernstein)

  • Patient refused revision internal hardware due to infection anxiety.
  • Removed the intramedullary nail and re-reamed the canal to recanalize marrow spaces.
  • Left the soft-tissue wound open during reaming to flush debris out rather than leaving it in the defect.
  • Applied a circular hexapod external fixator for rigid multiplanar stability.
  • Augmented the defect with autologous anterior iliac crest bone graft (AICBG).
  • Applied progressive axial compression across the hexapod struts over 7 months.
  • Achieved complete bony consolidation without retained internal hardware.

Case 3: Failed Femoral Exchange Nailing with Endocrine Pathology

Clinical Presentation

  • Demographics: Pleasant female schoolteacher; non-smoker; BMI 40.
  • Injury History: Closed femoral shaft fracture treated initially with an intramedullary nail, followed by an unsuccessful exchange nailing.
  • Status at 8 Months: Severe weight-bearing pain preventing work.
  • Exam: Antalgic gait, neutral alignment, no signs of Cushing’s syndrome or hirsutism.
  • Radiographs: Metadiaphyseal oligotrophic femoral non-union with loose intramedullary hardware.
  • Workup: Inflammatory markers normal; labs revealed elevated TSH, decreased free T4 (hypothyroidism), and severe vitamin D insufficiency.

Biomechanics: Why Exchange Nailing Fails in the Metadiaphysis

  • Reamed exchange nails rely on an isthmic cortical fit to control motion.
  • In the wide metadiaphysis, even a maximum-diameter nail (15 mm) cannot engage the distant cortices.
  • The nail allows residual rotational and angular toggle, leading to persistent mechanical failure.
  • Nail dynamization was contraindicated: removal of locking screws in the wide metaphysis promotes shear instability rather than axial compression.

Augmentation Plating Over Retained Nail

  • Retained the existing intramedullary nail to preserve gross axial and length alignment.
  • Inserted a long, contoured locking plate percutaneously along the lateral tension surface.
  • Placed locking and non-locking screws around the intramedullary nail to provide multiplanar stability.
  • Delivered autologous cancellous bone graft locally through a small accessory incision.
  • Corrected underlying hypothyroidism and initiated high-dose vitamin D supplementation.
  • Radiographs confirmed bridging callus at 6 weeks, solid consolidation at 3 months, and mature union at 1 year.

Case 4: Hypertrophic Distal Tibial Non-Union with Varus Deformity

Clinical Presentation

  • Demographics: 62-year-old male presenting 4 years post-injury with progressive deformity and pain.
  • Surgical History:
    • Index distal tibia ORIF using screws alone (failed).
    • Revised to an intramedullary nail (failed).
    • Revised to an exchange nail with allograft (failed).
  • Radiographs & Exam: Large, exuberant “elephant foot” callus with 15° of varus deformity originating from the distal tibia.
  • Pathoanatomy: The non-union was biologically active (hypertrophic) but mechanically unstable due to varus malalignment.

Deformity Realignment via Ilizarov / Hexapod Concept

  • Exchange nailing and plating cannot correct distal angular deformities within dense hypertrophic bone without extensive osteotomies.
  • Removed the failed intramedullary nail and distal hardware.
  • Re-reamed the canal to recanalize sclerotic bone.
  • Performed an adjacent low-energy percutaneous corticotomy (Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis principle) to stimulate local biology.
  • Applied a rigid circular hexapod frame to correct the varus deformity gradually using computer software.
  • Maintained rigid stability without inserting new internal implants.
  • The hexapod was removed at 6 months, revealing complete bridging callus, restored mechanical alignment, and pain-free weight-bearing.

Technical Controversies and Rapid-Fire Consensus

1. The Role of Nail Dynamization

  • Panel Consensus: Essentially obsolete in modern fracture care.
  • Highly unpredictable in the tibia; risks acute shortening and rotational collapse.
  • Occasionally useful in simple, transverse, isthmic femoral shaft fractures, but rarely indicated in clinical practice.

2. Intraoperative Pathology & Frozen Sections

  • Routine frozen sections for polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) per high-power field are unhelpful in aseptic non-unions.
  • Chronic mechanical pseudoarthroses harbor baseline non-specific chronic inflammation that complicates interpretation.
  • Send deep intraoperative tissue cultures, but rely on macroscopic inspection and preoperative serologies.

3. Screening for Endocrine and Metabolic Deficits

  • Routinely check vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D), calcium, phosphate, PTH, and thyroid profiles (TSH, free T4) in patients with unexplained non-unions.
  • Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent; empirically treat with 50,000 IU weekly when deficient.
  • Refer to an endocrinologist if multiple screening labs are abnormal or if secondary metabolic bone disease is suspected.

4. Augmentation Plating vs. Blocking Screws

  • Blocking (Poller) screws improve nail trajectory during insertion but provide minimal long-term axial stability once a non-union develops.
  • Augmentation plating over a retained intramedullary nail provides superior torsional, axial, and angular rigidity in metadiaphyseal non-unions.
Post Views: 3,010

Related Posts

  • Posterior shoulder Instability

    Courtesy: Prof Nabil Ebraheim, University of Toledo, Ohio, USA

  • Posterior Instability of Shoulder

    Posterior instability of the shoulder lennard funk from Lennard Funk Courtesy : Prof Lennard Funk,…

  • Posterior Instability of the Shoulder

    Courtesy:Jim Bradley MD, 200 Delafield Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15215, USA and Arthrex

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

instagram slideshare

Categories

  • -Applied Anatomy
  • -Approaches
  • -Basic Sciences
  • -Cartilage & Meniscus
  • -Classifications
  • -Examination
  • -Foot and Ankle
  • -Foot and Ankle Trauma
  • -FRCS(Tr and Orth) tutorials
  • -Gait
  • -Hand and Wrist
  • -Hand and Wrist Trauma
  • -Hand Infections
  • -Hip and Knee
  • -Hip Preservation
  • -Infections
  • -Joint Reconstruction
  • -Knee Arthroplasty
  • -Knee Preservation
  • -Metabolic Disorders
  • -Oncology
  • -OrthoBiologics
  • -OrthoPlastic
  • -Paediatric Orthopaedics
  • -Paediatric Trauma
  • -Patellofemoral Joint
  • -Pelvis
  • -Peripheral Nerves
  • -Principles
  • -Principles of Surgery
  • -Radiology
  • -Rheumatology
  • -Shoulder and Elbow
  • -Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty
  • -Spine Deformity
  • -Spine Oncology
  • -Spine Trauma
  • -Spine, Pelvis & Neurology
  • -Sports Ankle and Foot
  • -Sports Elbow
  • -Sports Knee
  • -Sports Medicine
  • -Sports Medicine Hip
  • -Sports Shoulder
  • -Sports Wrist
  • -Statistics
  • -Technical Tip
  • -Technology in Orth
  • -Trauma
  • -Trauma (Upper Limb)
  • -Trauma Life Support
  • -Trauma Reconstruction
  • Book Shelf
  • Book Shelf Medical
  • Careers
  • Case Studies and Free Papers
  • DNB Ortho
  • Evidence Based Orthopaedic Principles
  • Evidence Based Orthopaedics
  • Exam Corner
  • Fellowships
  • Guest Editor
  • Guest Reviews
  • Image Quiz
  • Instructional Course Lectures
  • Journal Club
  • MCQs
  • Meetings and Courses
  • MS Ortho
  • Multimedia
  • News and Blog
  • Plaster Techniques
  • Podcasts
  • Public Health
  • Rehabilitation
  • Research
  • Shorts and Reels
Copyright@orthopaedicprinciples.com. All right rerserved.